CFL vs HPS?


 

Have you heard the discouraging rumors regarding CFL growing?

rumor

 

CFLs are good for vegging and cloning only”

CFLs will never make dense buds

“Compact fluorescent lights grow airy buds”

“HPS lights are the only choice for flowering plants”

Compact ‘floros’ have bad light penetration”

“CFL growers are evil terrorists and should be arrested”

 

 

If you haven’t tuned in to the “CFL sucks” debate, good for you! You see, the Internet allows information to spread so much that,
most unchecked, non-factual crap is passed around as the truth!The CFL vs. HID fiasco is really no different….

Most who assume CFLs are a poor choice compared to HPS or MH lighting:

  • Have never grown using CFLs before and are just jumping the ole’ bandwagon.
  • Used CFLs placed incorrectly and/or inadequate lumens and/or inadequate wattage.
  • Are simply beginners; the CFLs weren’t the blame–their gardening skills were–or lack thereof

 

Now, to be 100% honest and objective, CFLs are nowhere near the holy-grail of growing. The key word here is efficiency.

See, if you are using 1,000 watts of CFL lighting, and it can only penetrate four plants successfully, that is NOT efficient. You could just as easily get a 600 watt HPS light and illuminate roughly double the amount of plants in the same space.

 

Compact fluorescent lights ARE a poor choice for growing if any of the following applies:

 

1.) You are growing in an area with minimal reflective qualities

CFLs need excellent reflection; preferably Mylar which redirects up to 95% of the light back to your plants. Growing in areas with walls far from the plants contribute to lost light which equals lost lumens and lost energy. Your grand total is smaller yields, buds with poor structure and low levels of CBD and THC; nowhere close to as potent as it SHOULD be.

 

2.) You are growing HUGE plants

CFL lighting is used to conserve; whether it is saving energy, money, light footprint, etc. That being said, growing large plants is not an efficient use of CFL lighting. If your CFL hood or reflector covers the square area of your plant successfully, you are getting your “money’s worth.” However, if you have a large shaded area on your plant(s), you are in essence starving your plant of energy it needs to grow spectacular flowers.

 

Grow your plants only as big as you can train them, to receive adequate lighting throughout all foliage.

  • Too tall = not efficient (lower leaves get little to no light)
  • Too wide = not efficient (outer bud sites and leaves get less light)

Keep your CFL-grown plants a reasonable size, width and height-wise, and you will be pleased with your results. And your haters just might too.

 

3.) You are looking for commercial-scale yields

If you seek commercial yields, such as multiple pounds in dry weight per harvest, you’ve tuned in to the wrong article! Moreover, you shouldn’t be looking at CFLs at all. The key word being: EFFICIENCY. HID lighting stomps all over compact lighting by design; no one SHOULD expect to feed the super-intense light needed for huge areas, using budget bulbs!

IF they do?  Laugh-Out-Loud!

 

4.) You are growing many plants or in a large area

Read #3 above; this qualifies as commercial yields, basically.

  • Many plants in a small area = Okay, but not optimal
  • Many plants in a large area = This is a no, no.
  • Fewer plants in a small area = Perfect!!
  • Fewer plants in a large area = Not ideal; avoid.

Fewer plants in a small area is what you are looking for to get expectation-surpassing results from your compact fluorescent lumens.

Final Thoughts:

So the question should no longer be CFL vs. HID lighting. It should be a matter of saving energy (or money), or just going for broke with a “hot” system. As long as you’ve taken all of the aforementioned points into serious consideration, you WILL be making the best choice for your situation by investing in compact fluorescent lighting!

By Robert Narley